Late to the Party – Modern Warfare 3

MW3 Teaser

I recently subscribed to LOVEFiLM – an online service where you may rent games and movies. I’m still in the free trial stage and I’ve decided to make the most of it before I decide whether I keep it. For me, this is the best chance to try games that I wouldn’t necessarily buy, or haven’t had a chance to. NeverDead and LA Noire were two examples of this, respectively. This week, I received Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 and Asura’s Wrath in the mail.

The first disc that I slot into my PlayStation 3 happened to be Modern Warfare 3. Talk about late to the party; this is the first time I’ve played this particular Call of Duty. The thing that interests me about this title is just how bipolar the internet is in it’s attitude towards the game. Modern Warfare 3 is apparently both the greatest game ever made, and the worst game ever made. There rarely ever appears to be any form of middle ground – at least, that’s the case on the internet.

I’ve only just finished the game but I’ve yet to play it’s main function: multiplayer. Because of the title’s focus on its multiplayer component over its single player campaign, I still consider this a first impression article rather than a review. I ask of you to keep in mind that any opinions following may not consist with the final review and will not include multiplayer.

As it’s own game, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 is honestly a good game. That’s right. I said it. The controls are smooth and well refined, and the action is well paced. It’s what you would expect from a best seller. So why does the game get so much hate? The issue is, it hasn’t changed at all in five years. At best, it’s become more over the top (which makes it more fun in my opinion), but it still very difficult telling it apart from the previous Call of Duty titles. That’s the main issue, and that’s why this is going to be a short post. If you’ve played the previous games then you know exactly what to expect from Modern Warfare 3. It’s the exact same game, if only with some extra guns. This is the controversial issue.

As a game, Modern Warfare 3 is fun and exciting. It’s simple and easy to play, and ultimately delivers a pleasing and rewarding six hours of gameplay experience in it’s campaign. As a sequel, the game does little beyond extending the story to warrant it’s own existence. Frankly, it fails as a sequel. Furthermore, I’ll add that the game just seems rather forgettable. There’s a high chance that I will remember little of my play-through of the game and, in fact, I am already failing to recall certain moments.

The game doesn’t deserve the hate though, it’s certainly a good piece of entertainment. Unfortunately, it seems to be nothing more than a Bay movie in video game form. It’s a fun yet shallow experience. And that’s okay too. If only Activision would stop milking it.

In conclusion, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 is a good first-person shooter but ultimately fails as a sequel. Your money is better spent elsewhere if you already own another title from the franchise. Of course, I doubt that will stop you. If you’ve never played the franchise then I suggest you at least give it a rent. It’s still quite fun.

  • Vague Raconteur

    It's not bad, but it's the same game, made over and over, as if the idea's been bent over and had unspeakable things done to it until it produces a disgusting abominable offspring version that can have the same things done to it to produce an even more similar, abominable offspring in the form of a game.
    Activision is a dark and evil company. O.O

  • Anonymous

    for me is simply the best war game ever. alone or with friends is sure fun for all!